Skip to main content
Partial differential equations II
Lesson 30 of 75
Review

Energy methods

Objective. Prove uniqueness and stability estimates.

  1. 1. Learn
  2. 2. Worked example
  3. 3. Practice
  4. 4. Feedback
  5. 5. Continue

Learn: the key idea

Energy methods prove uniqueness and stability for PDEs by tracking a quadratic quantity, usually an integral of the square of the solution or its gradient, and showing it cannot grow. For the heat equation uₜ = uₓₓ with homogeneous boundary conditions, define E(t) = ∫u² dx; differentiating and integrating by parts gives E'(t) = −2∫uₓ² dx ≤ 0, so the energy is non-increasing. If two solutions share the same initial and boundary data, their difference w solves the same equation with zero initial energy, forcing E(t) = 0 for all t and hence w ≡ 0, proving uniqueness. Example: this same argument shows small perturbations in initial data lead to controlled, non-growing differences in the solution, giving stability.

Worked example

Use an energy method to show uniqueness for uₜ = uₓₓ on (0,1) with u(0,t) = u(1,t) = 0 and prescribed initial data.

0 … 1
Illustrated card showing 0 … 1
  1. 1Let w = u₁ − u₂ be the difference of two solutions; w solves wₜ = wₓₓ with w(0,t) = w(1,t) = 0 and w(x,0) = 0.
  2. 2Define E(t) = ∫₀¹ w² dx and differentiate: E'(t) = 2∫₀¹ wwₜ dx = 2∫₀¹ wwₓₓ dx.
  3. 3Integrate by parts: 2∫₀¹ wwₓₓ dx = [2wwₓ]₀¹ − 2∫₀¹ wₓ² dx = −2∫₀¹ wₓ² dx, since the boundary term vanishes.
  4. 4So E'(t) ≤ 0 and E(0) = 0, forcing E(t) = 0 for all t, hence w ≡ 0 and the solution is unique.

Answer: w ≡ 0, so the solution is unique

Concept mastery

Based on your past attempts at this lesson — the question types to practise again come first.

Complete a practice set to see your concept breakdown here.

Practice

Practice happens on its own screen, one question at a time. Answers stay hidden until you submit yours, and you can stop and pick up at the same question later.

Start practising

Common mistake. A common mistake is differentiating ∫u² dx under the integral sign without substituting the PDE for uₜ, so the boundary terms from integration by parts are lost and the sign of E'(t) cannot be determined.

Your progress

Tick each step as you finish it. Your exact reading position is saved automatically, so Continue drops you back on the same line.

0 of 5 steps complete

Your place saves automatically as you read.

My dashboard